Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You
Click for ZooMed

Study: Pythons won't survive outside of Florida

By Cindy Steinle · September 25, 2010 9:20 pm

It'll come as a disappointment to the media, no doubt, but it looks like giant Burmese Pythons aren't going to flood out of the Everglades and take over half the United States after all. The Savannah River Ecology Laboratory (SREL) study is completed, and the findings are clear -- and no surprise at all to those who know anything about Burmese Pythons. From the Aikenstandard.com:
Of the 10 pythons tracked, none survived the winter, all succumbing to one of the most brutal winters on record in South Carolina. "Our results suggest that Burmese pythons from the population currently established in Florida are capable of withstanding conditions substantially cooler that those typically experienced in southern Florida, but may not be able to survive severe winters in regions as temperate as central South Carolina," the researchers reported. [....] Half of the snakes perished on Dec. 11, when temperatures dipped to around 25 degrees. Of those initial deaths, none of the snakes had sought cover or refuge in the artificial dens. Three more snakes died between Dec. 17 and Jan. 4, each having failed to seek cover during subfreezing temperatures. The last two snakes were found in underground cover in mid January during an extreme cold spell.
The study initially drew fire from the reptile community because of the provision of artificial dens, food being provided as opposed to the snakes having to fend for themselves, and warmer temperatures caused by run-off from the local power plant. Even with all those factors taken into account, however, the pythons still did not survive the winter. To read the study, click here. Just a warning, the full study will cost $34.00. The abstract, however, is presented in its entirety after the bump.

SREL Abstract

Understanding potential for range expansion is critical when evaluating the risk posed by invasive species. Burmese pythons (Python molurus bivittatus) are established in southern Florida and pose a significant threat to native ecosystems. Recent studies indicate that climate suitable for the species P. molurus exists throughout much of the southern United States. We examined survivorship, thermal biology, and behavior of Burmese pythons from South Florida in a semi-natural enclosure in South Carolina, where winters are appreciably cooler than in Florida, but within the predicted region of suitable climate. All pythons acclimated to the enclosure, but most died after failing to seek appropriate refugia during sub-freezing weather. The remaining snakes used refugia but died during an unusually cold period in January 2010. Although all snakes died during the study, most survived extended periods at temperatures below those typical of southern Florida and none exhibited obvious signs of disease. Our study represents a first step in evaluating the results of climate matching models and we address factors that may affect range expansion in this invasive species.

Comments

Karenc Sep 26, 2010

LMAO! OMG you wasted money on this so-called "study"?

How warm was the "cover" you provided the snakes? Months at 60 degree temps will kill them.

But, then again, what do I know? I'm simply a lowly snake owner. And, being one, I know that it's harder to kill a subtropical species of snake kept at cold temperatures than it does with too much heat.

It takes months and months of temps being too cold for the snake to starve to death. You see, when it's too cold, they won't eat, or if they do eat, they won't be able to digest their food.

IMO your "study" was nothing more than animal abuse and a huge waste of money.

Let's put dogs n cats outside in temps too cold for them to survive and see how many months it takes them to die.

Why don't you listen to the people who actually keep and breed these magnificant animals? If they could be kept at 60 degrees, then every Burmese python owner would be ecstatic....

I'm thinking of the savings on my electric bill. I keep my python room at 80 degrees year round and they all have spot heating up to 92 degrees. Silly me.

scott Sep 26, 2010

karen,
the study was done to see if burmese pythons had the potential to become a nationwide pest as the usfw, animal planet, and peta suggested. be glad it was done, as it shows your pet is not the threat it was being made out to be by these groups. you are aware these groups were trying to make possession of these illegal referencing made-up nonsense, yes?

Karenc Sep 26, 2010

I know all about PITA and the H$U$ and why the study was done and I still believe it was a colossal waste of time and money. It was nothing more than animal abuse in the most cruelest of forms. Leaving an animal outside in the winter to see if it will freeze to death.

john Sep 27, 2010

As a biologist I understand why studies like these are done. People, especially scientist like proof. You can't argue it or dispute it, so it is great that they did this study. Yes any one who owns a burm already knew this, but there was no standardized research on the subject, so you could argue it. It wasn't a waste, and as resident of Georgia, I am very happy this study turned out the way it did, cause we were up next for all the ridiculous python laws.

RaZEDaHeLL Sep 27, 2010

"People, especially scientist like proof."

Oh yea.... as if the thousands of snake keepers nationwide couldn't tell ya the truth...

scott Sep 27, 2010

Regardless of what reptile keepers know, scientific publication is THE REQUIRED METHOD to prove such knowledge.
Hearsay(ergo "what snake keepers tell ya"), does nothing to sway scientists, legislators, or laws. These entities more than "like proof," they REQUIRE PROOF.
This study is PRICELESS, as it refutes erroneous scientific research papers currently thrown about the federal government. These erroneous reports are seen as gospel, and used to back the draconian legislation being proposed.
Without proper research reports, these erroneous scientific papers are ALL legislators can use.

scott Sep 27, 2010

Unfortunately, your opinion carries no weight when legislators write these types of laws.
It certainly was not a waste of money if you like keeping these reptiles, and wish to continue in the future.
Your comments seem illogical, as the only people who would say this research is a waste of money would be those groups who believe having these reptiles is somehow inherently "wrong."
Ultimately, the only thing which matters is properly executed research publications which have followed the scientific method.

Add a comment

Click to visit Classifieds
Click here to visit Classifieds
Click to visit Spitfire Reptiles
Site Tools